The bottom line at the Copenhagen Climate Conference is the same bottom line found in every Obama proposal - the redistribution of wealth from you to anybody else the government designates.

"Redistribution of Wealth" has been the holy grail of one world levelers for over 150 years.

At Copenhagen, the same folks who failed to impose a "New World Order" through international communism, and who have also failed to impose world government through the U.N., believe they have the right formula at last. 

The plan is simple. Hijack the science of climatology; hype evidence that the earth is warming; predict imminent disaster to frighten enough people to justify trillions in reparations from developed nations whose standard of living now threatens the whole planet with destruction, to undeveloped nations who are the "victims" of the success of free nations. [...]

The climate threat, you see, has been caused by the evil capitalist U.S. raping and pillaging the earth, spewing CO2 into the atmosphere, melting the icecaps, killing the polar bear, etc. etc.  It apparently doesn't matter that there are more polar bears today than there were 50 years ago and their population appears to be increasing, not decreasing.  These bears have adapted to several ice ages and warming periods that followed without apparent problem.

It also apparently doesn't matter that China now emits more CO2 than the U.S. and is building a new coal fired power plant every couple of weeks on average this year. Yet the Obama pledge for the U.S. taxpayer to pony up 1/4 to 1/3 of the trillions being discussed at Copenhagen will really be a pledge to borrow more money from the Chinese to pay to developing countries to develop wind and solar energy. [...]

Delegates from 192 countries are gathered in Copenhagen hoping you don't notice the carbon footprint of the event itself.  [T]he delegates at Copenhagen will have over 1200 limousines at their disposal, they'll largely fly in on private jets, and they'll be wined and dined in the style roundly denounced by climate change fanatics as causing the very problem they are there ostensibly to solve.

Why not an Internet international conference?  Or, why not meet in Bangladesh where the low lying river delta is predicted to be under water because you eat steak?

The hypocrisy of the carbon footprint of the Conference pales into insignificance, however, when compared to the scandal of "Climategate."

The hacked e-mails between the very scientists that the U.N. relied on to proclaim the climate debate "over" reveal it is far from over. As North America experiences its coldest decade in many decades, the "hide the decline" "science" justifying saddling American taxpayers with more debt seems silly. Just three decades ago, "scientists" were predicting an ice age and some of them were even proposing INCREASING the emissions of CO2 to extend the planting season and save mankind from the threat.

The attitude at Copenhagen is denial. The opening speeches can be summarized with the phrase "shut up and vote." The Conference opened with a grotesque example of child abuse.  A video was shown of children from various parts of the world imploring the delegates to save them from the destruction of the planet. [...]

The President knows that climate change legislation (cap-and-tax) that passed the House last summer is dead in the Senate. In a breathtaking power play, the President's EPA Administrator declared this week that CO2 was a "pollutant" (never mind that plants would die without CO2) and could be regulated and taxed by the Administration without further legislation from Congress.

With public opinion swinging decisively against the "global warming caused by man" hoax, what power play lurks ahead to back up the President's predicted contribution "pledge" of billions of your dollars at Copenhagen next week ?

ClimateGate Scandal: emails contain discussions including what appear to be concerted efforts to withhold data. Just as troubling is conversations that allude to potentially manipulating climate data to “hide the decline” of temperatures seen in the last decade.

Some of the excerpts of emails within the archives:

From Michael E. Mann (witholding of information / data):
Dear Phil and Gabi,
I’ve attached a cleaned-up and commented version of the matlab code that I wrote for doing the Mann and Jones (2003) composites. I did this knowing that Phil and I are likely to have to respond to more crap criticisms from the idiots in the near future, so best to clean up the code and provide to some of my close colleagues in case they want to test it, etc. Please feel free to use this code for your own internal purposes, but don’t pass it along where it may get into the hands of the wrong people.

From Nick McKay (modifying data):
The Korttajarvi record was oriented in the reconstruction in the way that McIntyre said. I took a look at the original reference – the temperature proxy we looked at is x-ray density, which the author interprets to be inversely related to temperature. We had higher values as warmer in the reconstruction, so it looks to me like we got it wrong, unless we decided to reinterpret the record which I don’t remember. Darrell, does this sound right to you?

From Tom Wigley (acknowleding the urban effect):
We probably need to say more about this. Land warming since 1980 has been twice the ocean warming — and skeptics might claim that this proves that urban warming is real and important.

From Phil Jones (modification of data to hide unwanted results):
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

From Kevin Trenberth (failure of computer models):
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

From Michael Mann (truth doesn't matter):
Perhaps we'll do a simple update to  the Yamal post, e.g. linking Keith/s new page--Gavin t?  As to the issues of robustness, particularly w.r.t. inclusion of the Yamal series, we  actually emphasized that (including the Osborn and Briffa '06 sensitivity test) in our  original post! As we all know, this isn't about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.

From Phil Jones (witholding of data):
The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here! ... The IPCC comes in for a lot of stick. Leave it to you to delete as appropriate! Cheers Phil
PS I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act ! 

From Michael E. Mann (using a website to control the message, hide dissent):
Anyway, I wanted you guys to know that you’re free to use RC [RealClimate.org - A supposed neutral climate change website] Rein any way you think would be helpful. Gavin and I are going to be careful about what comments we screen through, and we’ll be very careful to answer any questions that come up to any extent we can. On the other hand, you might want to visit the thread and post replies yourself. We can hold comments up in the queue and contact you about whether or not you think they should be screened through or not, and if so, any comments you’d like us to include.

From Phil Jones (witholding of data):
If FOIA does ever get used by anyone, there is also IPR to consider as well. Data is covered by all the agreements we sign with people, so I will be hiding behind them.

Recently emails surfaced from top scientists are lying and fraudulating data to prove that global warming is real. Global warming is nothing but another trick to create a universal enemy to usher in the New World Order! research ClimateGate.

-----------------
By Jordan Sligar - Dec 1, 2009

Call him a corporate crony yearning after greater wealth and power or recognize him as a smart, decisive capitalist positioning his investments wisely, but the fact remains that former Vice President Al Gore seems a poster child for all who aspire to be a successful left-wing politician.

Most importantly, Gore can thank his brand of climate change for his financial and societal successes.

Gore’s green crusade recalls memorable Photoshopped images of polar bears fighting for their lives on the last remnant of a contracting glacier. It also brought us such riveting cinematic masterpieces, such as “The Day After Tomorrow” and “An Inconvenient Truth,” depicting the end of the world because of renegade chlorofluorocarbons.

Whether a “going green” fan or not, certainly one must admire the magnitude of Gore’s green marketing campaign, supported by a majority of western scientists partial to its message.

So it came as a shock to the world when breaking news surfaced allegedly linking Gore’s associates to fraud and manipulation of climate statistics in a documented string of thousands of e-mails.

The Wall Street Journal’s aptly named “Climate Gate” brought to light the fraudulent “consensus” among scientists working within the British Climate Research Unit. A Russian climatologist from the University of East Anglia made the discovery and leaked the confidential information to Washington Post associate editor Eugene Robinson.

It looks bad for Gore as more information surfaces. Apparently, it was all about the money.

Al Gore is a member of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a venture capital firm in Silicon Valley that invests heavily in green technology — more than 40 companies — and generates Gore well more than $100 million.

General Electric Co. and World Bank publicly pledged their support through financing targeted green initiatives. Robert Watson, the chief scientist of the World Bank, told Reuters, “The World Bank wants to breathe life back into a mooted $10 billion-plus fund to combat climate change.”

Suspicious about a conspiracy at the highest levels prior to the recent e-mail discovery, the U.S. Congress initiated a hearing on April 4th. The meeting highlighted a Bloomberg report focusing on Gore’s record jump in net worth from $2 million in 2004 to more than $100 Million in less than four years.

In response, Gore said he invested the $100 million into non-profits. Although it proved true, non-profits are tax-shelter organizations for what the left label the “super rich.”

Gore is the chairman of Team Generation Investment, Alliance for Climate Protection and founder of the “We” initiative, all incubators for a variety of the green initiatives. An estimated 77 percent of the money funnels right back to him and his endeavors, tax-free with additional tax credits for his philanthropy.

Worse, Gore and his venture partners stand to benefit exponentially from the Cap and Trade Climate bill Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., proposed. If the bill passes in the Senate, the New York Times and climatedepot.com estimate that Gore, his associates and a host of unnamed investors can receive a financial windfall of more than $4 billion per year.

Prior to these leaked “Climate Gate” e-mails, Gore and a handful of scientists had a majority of America and western society fooled. The question still remains whether there will be justice in the media against proven fraud on the left.Or, will the magnitude of this fraud be brushed under the rug at the behest of partisan politics and high stakes investors?

H1N1 Vaccination: A Eugenics Weapon for “Massive & Targeted Reduction of the World Population.” ??

“I am emerging from a long silence on the subject of vaccination, because I feel that, this time, the stakes involved are huge. The consequences may spread much further than anticipated,” writes Canadian doctor Ghislaine Lanctôt, who believes the A(H1N1) virus will be used in a pandemic concocted and orchestrated by the WHO, an international organization that serves military, political and industrial interests.

Lanctôt warns that the elite and their minions will introduce a compulsory vaccination that will contain a deadly virus and this will be used specifically as a eugenics weapon for “massive and targeted reduction of the world population.” Moreover, a pandemic will also be used to further establish martial law and a police state, according to Lanctôt, and activate concentration camps “built to accommodate the rebellious” and eventually transfer power from all nations to a single United Nations government and thus fulfill the sinister plans of the New World Order.

------------------ 

Warning: Swine Flu Shot Linked to Killer Nerve Disease
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
September 01 2009

A warning that the swine flu vaccine has been linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the UK Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter.

The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health, was leaked to The Daily Mail, leading to demands to know why the information has not been given to the public before the vaccination of millions of people, including children, begins.

It tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal.

The letter refers to the use of a similar swine flu vaccine in the United States in 1976 when:

•More people died from the vaccination than from swine flu
•The vaccine may have increased the risk of contracting GBS by eight times
•The vaccine was withdrawn after just ten weeks when the link with GBS became clear
•The U.S. Government was forced to pay out millions of dollars to those affected

Concerns have already been raised that the new vaccine has not been sufficiently tested and that the effects, especially on children, are unknown.

Source: http://bit.ly/1U0BZf

------------------

Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu
Defense Secretary, ex-chairman of flu treatment rights holder, sees portfolio value growing.
October 31, 2005: 10:55 AM EST
By Nelson D. Schwartz, Fortune senior writer
 
NEW YORK (Fortune) - The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world.

Rumsfeld served as Gilead (Research)'s chairman from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001, and he still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial disclosures filed by Rumsfeld.
 
The forms don't reveal the exact number of shares Rumsfeld owns, but in the past six months fears of a pandemic and the ensuing scramble for Tamiflu have sent Gilead's stock from $35 to $47. That's made the Pentagon chief, already one of the wealthiest members of the Bush cabinet, at least $1 million richer.

Source: http://bit.ly/FhPYV

President Obama is on a path toward establishing a one-world government. This is the warning of Christopher Monckton, a former major policy adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

In December, world leaders will descend upon Copenhagen to sign a United Nations climate change treaty that will succeed the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which is aimed at reducing greenhouse gases and set to expire in 2012. An agreement has been drafted. The goal of the Copenhagen treaty is to erect an international cap-and-trade regime to curb carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, said to be responsible for man-made global warming. Recently, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned of a "climate catastrophe" - a rising wave of floods, droughts and shrinking food crops - unless the treaty is signed. Mr. Brown even said global warming would inflict more damage than both world wars and the Great Depression combined; the world has only several weeks to save itself from impending doom. [...]

Global-warming alarmists are using the myth of climate change to impose an embryonic socialist world government. Following the collapse of communism, the West's progressive elites desperately searched for a viable ideological alternative. They found it in environmentalism.

Although the Green movement wraps itself in the flag of empirical science, it represents the very opposite: a dogma that provides meaning and purpose to its rabid followers. The ideology justifies massive tax increases and government control of the economy; it seeks to cripple free enterprise and curtail market-driven growth. Many of today's Greens are yesterday's Reds.

Global warming is the greatest fraud of our time. The overwhelming scientific evidence shows that, rather than getting hotter, the Earth's temperatures are cooling. Increasing numbers of leading scientists are challenging the flawed computer models used by eco-alarmists. [...]

Moreover, Mr. Monckton points out that, in paragraph 38, Annex 1, the Copenhagen draft calls for a U.N.-created "government" responsible for taxation, enforcement and redistribution. In other words, the draft treaty explicitly demands that the world body erect an international mechanism with the power to impose emission-reduction targets for each country, determine acceptable levels of CO2 and levy global taxes.

The United States would lose control over its environmental policy. Also, it would sign its death warrant as a functioning democracy, enabling the United Nations to administer a fledgling world government possessing the authority to regulate and tax the American economy. The treaty is a sword aimed at the heart of our national sovereignty. If Mr. Obama signs the Copenhagen treaty, he "will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your prosperity away forever," Mr. Monckton recently told an audience in Minnesota. "I read that treaty and what it says is this: that a world government is going to be created."

Yet the U.S. Senate can avoid this disastrous course. A supermajority of 67 votes is required to ratify the treaty. In 1997, the Senate in a 95-0 vote rejected the Kyoto Protocol, thereby preventing the United States from joining. Mr. Monckton believes that, in order to avoid defeat, Mr. Obama will try to circumvent the ratification process. If he does, he will spark a political revolt that will make the Tea Party protests look tame by comparison.

Mr. Obama has vowed to create a "green economy" based on "green-collar jobs" and "a green New Deal." The Copenhagen treaty would enable him to accomplish his revolutionary ambitions. It would mark his Cultural Revolution - the permanent transformation of America.

Following the 2009 G20 summit, plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the US dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. As the Telegraph reported, “the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body.”These are not new suggestions, as they have been in the plans of the global elite for a long time. In the midst of the current crisis, the elite have fast-tracked their agenda of forging a New World Order in finance.

An article in the Telegraph reported that Gordon Brown would want “to see the IMF reformed to become a ‘global central bank’ closely monitoring the international economy and financial system.”

In early Oct 2008, it was reported that, “as the world's central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic "policeman" to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.”

On Jan 1, 1999, the EU established the Euro as its regional currency. The Euro has grown in prominence over the past several years.

The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) was established on May 23, 2008. As the BBC reported, “The leaders of 12 South American nations have formed a regional body aimed at boosting economic and political integration in the region.”

In June of 2008, it was reported that, “Gulf Arab central bankers agreed to create the nucleus of a joint central bank next year in a major step forward for monetary union but signaled that a new common currency would not be in circulation by an agreed 2010 target.”

The African Union was founded in 2002 consisting of 53 African states. In 2003, the Brookings Institution produced a paper on African economic integration (stating) that, “Africa, like other regions of the world, is fixing its sights on creating a common currency. Already, there are projects for regional monetary unions, and the bidding process for an eventual African central bank is about to begin.”

A report written by former MP, Herbert Grubel, called, The Case for the Amero. He wrote that, “The plan for a North American Monetary Union presented in this study is designed to include Canada, the United States, and Mexcio,” and a “North American Central Bank, like the European Central Bank, will have a constitution making it responsible only for the maintenance of price stability and not for full employment.”

In 1988, The Economist ran an article titled, Get Ready for the Phoenix, in which they wrote, “THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the late twentieth century.”

In Feb of 2009, the Times Online reported that a “New world order in banking [is] necessary. But of course, the ones that are shaping this new banking system are the champions of the previous banking system. Ultimately, what this implies is that the future of the global political economy is one of increasing moves toward a global system of governance, or a world government, with a world central bank and global currency; and that, concurrently, these developments are likely to materialize in the face of and as a result of a decline in democracy around the world, and thus, a rise in authoritarianism. What we are witnessing is the creation of a New World Order. http://bit.ly/TihtR

It is disturbing to hear the President of the [USA] propagate that which is not true. In his speech to the [UN] today he advanced the Global Warming/Climate Change myth. At the same time appearing in the [NY] Times an article by Andrew Revkin contains the fact that “global temperatures have been stable for a decade and may even drop in the next few years”, In addition, there are many scientists, meteorologists and weather experts who have debunked the notion that the creation of excessive amounts of Carbon Dioxide is the cause of global warming if, in fact, it actually exists.

When leaders in all major countries in the world including ours claim there is climate change that has been created by mankind caused green house gasses our citizens tend to believe them. When they claim that man made Carbon Dioxide is a green house gas and must be reduced markedly people tend to accept that as a fact. In fact, established evidence proves the propaganda which they are conveying is not the truth. Why would our leaders [...] lie to us?  There is a reason [and] especially since it could lead to the loss of our country’s sovereignty. [...]

In a speech to the UN relating to the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change in 2000, French [PM] Jacques Chirac said “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the [EU] would like to see established.“ Adding on to this rhetoric was climate change advocate and former VP Al Gore’s statement that the proposed Congressional Carbon Cap and Trade bill will help bring about “Global Governance”. In a speech made in 1991 we also also heard former President George H Bush refer to a “New World Order”.

Financier and major political campaign donor George Soros (György Schwartz) has been an avid advocate of a strong central international government to correct for the excesses of self-interest. [...] He is also a member of the Tri-Lateral Commission that has had the issue of global governance on its agenda for many years. Founded 40 years ago by David Rockefeller the commission members also include Henry Kissinger, Madeline Albright, George H. Bush, William J. Clinton, [...], John D. Rockefeller IV and other noted national and international persona of various political persuasions.

Aiding and abetting this movement [...] “Climate Change”, that has become a vehicle to create a world wide emergency. What better way to usurp a country’s sovereignty than to impose rules and regulations such as those first encompassed in the Endangered Species Act and now being proposed in the Cap and Trade bill. This is an obvious world wide conspiracy that transcends political parties. [...]

The questions arises, why do these people support this movement that has no basis in fact? There exists in this world an elite class whom I call the “super rich” that follow an ideology that would minimize the chance of potential chaos caused by disgruntled elements of society. Their intent would be to find a way to eventually establish an international world government. That is their ideology and the result would be loss of our sovereignty and distribution of income and accumulated wealth among the rest of us. Essentially socialism that ends up being a two class system with the upper elite class having the power of the purse controlling the masses. [...]

Giving further fodder to the “World Governance” folks is the “economic tsunami” caused by our Federal Reserve Syatem (FED). The mismanagement of the money supply over the last 50 years, and especially since 1999, that has devalued our currency has provided a necessary element to the “World Governance” crowd.  This being the need for a single world currency and a central world bank necessary for its full implementation. [...] Our freedom is under attack.

Brave new world for reticent fools
By Ken Craggs, Jul 21, 2009
 
In a speech last Wednesday to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton effectively admitted that she has often been to the CFR’s mother ship in New York, but is happy that she now only has to travel to a CFR outpost in Washington, DC, to get her orders.

According to the official transcript, Clinton said, “I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters. I have been often to, I guess, the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.”

She went on to say, “Today we must acknowledge two inescapable facts that define our world. First, no nation can meet the world’s challenges alone. The issues are too complex. Too many players are competing for influence, from rising powers to corporations to criminal cartels, from NGOs to al Qaeda, from state-controlled media to individuals using Twitter.

“Second, most nations worry about the same global threats -- from non-proliferation to fighting disease to counter-terrorism, but also face very real obstacles for reasons of history, geography, ideology, and inertia. They face these obstacles and they stand in the way of turning commonality of interest into common action.”

She concluded with, “More than 230 years ago, Thomas Paine said, ‘We have it within our power to start the world over again.’ Today, in a new and very different era, we are called upon to use that power. I believe we have the right strategy, the right priorities, the right policies, we have the right president, and we have the American people, diverse, committed, and open to the future.”

Clinton’s comments are yet another step towards getting people to accept that, regardless of where you are from, there are organisations and families, such as the Rockefellers’ and Rothschilds’ that are more powerful than the government of your country. Once that is accepted, it is, theoretically, a smaller step to accepting global governance by a New World Order (NWO).

Nietzsche wrote that “knowledge is potential power.” We have to use our knowledge to regain our power, but too many people are too apathetic to try. Simply feed them mind rotting TV and drip feed them carefully selected news of current events and they will sit fat, dumb and happy while their freedom is taken away from them bit by bit.

The NWO is not even trying to cover things up anymore. They are obviously of the opinion that people are either unwilling or unable to do anything other than go along with whatever the NWO chooses to say or do. And now that more people are experiencing unemployment, poverty, homelessness, hunger and illness, the NWO are confident that statements, such as those made by Hillary Clinton, will soon be forgotten as people concentrate on their own problems. [...] http://bit.ly/EB4Mq

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put at least one foot in her mouth in stating a major geopolitical truth, inadvertently or otherwise, about the secretive, elitist, globalist organization, The Council On Foreign Relations, and the tremendous influence and power it wields over the US Government.  Her remarks came during a major speech she was invited to give at the new at the new CFR Washington DC branch.
 
Speaking to CFR President Richard Haas from the podium, Clinton - not an official CFR member - said, "Thank you very much, Richard, and I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters.  I have been often to, I guess, the 'mother ship' in New York City, but it's good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department." Mrs. Clinton then turned to the audience and continued, "We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won't have as far to go to be told what we should be doing.

[...] Clinton might just as well have described herself as a CFR puppet.  Whether her remarks were intended to be 'humorous' isn't known.  Important truths often slip out under many guises and this 'confirmation' by Clinton is one of the more obvious unspoken truths in how major American Foreign policy is shaped and controlled by the CFR.

The CFR is made up the elite in politics, business, media, and finance. They are committed to an authoritarian globalist agenda, which seeks to dissolve American Sovereignty and Freedom. They have ardently promoted the North American Union modeled after the EU. The Council on Foreign Relations has outlined their agenda in a document called Building a North American Community . Director of International Economics for the Council Ben Steil stated that the world must "abandon unwanted currencies, replacing them with dollars, euros, and multinational currencies as yet unborn."

Speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations, Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner stated that he is open to the idea of a global currency to replace the dollar. Unlike Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations is more open to the press. However they have ardently pushed a globalist agenda to weaken American sovereignty including the North American Union modeled after the EU.

Former Congressman John R. Rarick warned us about their agenda: "The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education and mass communication media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation's right to know machinery – the news media – usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities."

Much like Hillary's honest statement the elites have spoken openly about their agenda and contemp for our nation and its citizens. Committed Globalist and long time director of the CFR, David Rockefeller in a speech at the 1991 Bilderberg Convention stated "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty on an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." http://bit.ly/vh7r6

New faces but the same message of a New World Order. 

Kissinger: Obama's 'task' is to help create a 'new world order'
http://bit.ly/16xLK5
President Nixon's Secretary of State, the aging Henry Kissinger, recently told CNBC that he believes the current world economic crisis is a "great opportunity" for President-elect Obama to help create a "new world order."

"I think that his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period, when really a "New World Order" can be created. It's a great opportunity. It isn't such a crisis."

"The phrase 'new world order' traces back at least as far as 1940, when author H.G. Wells used it as the title of a book about a socialist, unified, one-world government," writes Drew Zahn. "The phrase has also been linked to American presidents, including Woodrow Wilson, whose work on establishing the League of Nations pioneered the concept of international government bodies, and to the first President Bush, who used the phrase in a 1989 speech."

In that 1989 speech, the elder Bush told Congress, "A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: A new era … in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony."

----
Africa's new world order
By LISA VAN DUSEN, WASHINGTON BUREAU

Of the three legs of U.S. President Barack Obama's foreign trip last week -- to Moscow, the G-8 in l'Aquila, Italy, and Accra, Ghana -- the African stop was the most interesting and not just because of the symbolism. [...] There is a montage of firsts that comes from an American president who provides not only a new narrative bridge to the rest of the world but a visual bridge to a different political history.

[...] Obama's broader message to the Ghanaian parliament was that no continent is an island in a new world so small that no island is an island anymore. "I see Africa as a fundamental part of our interconnected world," he said.

In a place where cellphone saturation and adaptation have revolutionized life -- from the way farmers determine their prices to how people wire money to how doctors diagnose patients in remote villages -- people understand the word interconnected. The message was also that, "Africa's future is up to Africans," which may have been as much a message of empowerment to the legislators of one of Africa's most stable democracies as a caution to America's main rival for their attention.

----
Pope calls for a new world order
Barney Zwartz July 9, 2009; The Sydney Morning Herald

POPE Benedict XVI has proposed a new world political authority "with real teeth", possibly in place of the United Nations, to enforce an ethical financial order and end the global financial crisis. Calling for more aid, a bigger role for trade unions and an economic system aimed at the common good as well as profit, the Pope said only a moral market could end the crisis and solve world poverty.

The proposals were in his long-awaited encyclical - the second-highest level of papal teaching - released in Rome yesterday morning Australian time, before the G8 leaders gathered in Italy to discuss the global crisis. [...] His suggested political authority would manage globalisation, revive economies, stop the crisis deepening, protect the environment and regulate worldwide migration. It would need to be universally recognised and given power to ensure compliance from all countries.